DYSPEPSIA GENERATION

We have seen the future, and it sucks.

Why Green Architecture Hardly Ever Deserves the Name

5th July 2013

Read it.

Something surprising has happened with many so-called “sustainable” buildings. When actually measured in post-occupancy assessments, they’ve proven far less sustainable than their proponents have claimed. In some cases they’ve actually performed worse than much older buildings, with no such claims. A 2009 New York Times article, “Some buildings not living up to green label,” documented the extensive problems with many sustainability icons. Among other reasons for this failing, the Times pointed to the widespread use of expansive curtain-wall glass assemblies and large, “deep-plan” designs that put most usable space far from exterior walls, forcing greater reliance on artificial light and ventilation systems.

My, what a surprise! Aren’t you surprised? I’m sure surprised.

Comments are closed.