How Diversity Hurts the Sexual and Marriage Marketplaces
17th March 2012
Jehu lays it out in black and white.
Diversity promotes sprawl, by the engine of white flight and NAM crime. Sprawl promotes obesity, the number one killer of a woman’s value in the SMP and MMP.
That’s the bottom line. The implications are pretty ugly.
Diversity atomizes communities, which makes mass media more influential in relation. Mass media tends to reduce the status of males relative to females, which is toxic to attraction
The atomization of communities breeds virtual anonymity, which increases the effectiveness of the ‘Cad’ strategy relative to the ‘Dad’ strategy because communities that don’t actually exist find it very difficult to enforce shared norms, especially in ‘prisoner’s dilemma’ sorts of situations.
By importing lots of cheap labor, the value of the average Joe’s labor in the economy is bid down, lowering his status, which is, again, toxic to attraction
Importing lots of voters with a socialist bent tends to move states in a more socialist direction, and the thicker the social safety net, the more devalued the archetypal ‘beta provider’ becomes
Forcing people to walk on eggshells all the time around issues of diversity, ethnicity, or race coerces most people to act like cowards or fools, neither of which is especially attractive.
Be careful not to step in the diversity.