Too High a Price
13th March 2026
One of the many tiresome habits of the MSM and academic Islamist apologists is the regurgitation of the lie that the Islamic texts that expressly call for violence against non-believers are (a) context-specific and only applicable to events in the early formational years of Islam and/or (b) merely relevant in the context of self-defense when attacked by infidels. They don’t really call for violence.
Oddly enough, in the 14 centuries since the death of the Prophet, Muslims have rather regularly misinterpreted this modest, context-specific, purely defensive guidance while they continued to invade, conquer, kill and enslave many millions of non-Muslims. In recent years, the incidence of jihadist violence is increasing again despite the internet making available creative translations inserting the revisionist references to self-defense and despite assurances by our betters that these instances are a small aberration that we must endure in service to our commitments to diversity and to the polite ongoing euthanization of Western civilization.
…
We need to end the pretense that jihadist violence is some rare event unrelated to express religious texts. The weird but defining white liberal delusion that they have transcended their own culture, heritage, country prevents them from descending from that higher fictional plane to engage in a defense of the culture and heritage they have putatively escaped even when they themselves may be personally at risk of lethal attack. We all have to pretend there is no such thing as jihad because it would disrupt the fantasy world of Keir Starmer or Barrack Obama (kinda like The Matrix for narcissists.)