Why Not Be Opposed to Rape?
17th February 2026
Does Islam owe its existence to rape? Its founder had only a handful of followers until he declared that there was a divine imperative to raid, rape and enslave after which young men from raiding tribal cultures flocked to the new movement. He expressly urged young Arab men to go after “yellow-eyed” (apparently some reference to blond Byzantine women) as a religiously endorsed mission. As the expanding Islamic empire entered its third century, the pagan Vikings had established a thriving business of taking captured fair-complexion Slavic women down river to the satisfy the insatiable demands of Muslim slave markets.
If anyone thinks this is an abandoned archaic practice or value, I would invite a look at the attitudes and behaviors of young Muslim men in Rotherham, UK, Germany or in Sweden. Islam does not evolve or grow out of attitudes or practices. It is bound by the literally misogynistic directives of its founder who also once declared that the majority of denizens of hell were women condemned due to ingratitude and general bitchiness. Men may have four wives (Mohammed later received a divine directive to exempt himself from any such limitation) but an unlimited number of infidel female captives.
Famous heretic Salman Rushdie once opined that Mohammed was making it up as he went along with no clear plan other than establishing rules of deference to himself. Seemingly as a result of that ad hoc pattern there is weirdly disjointed quality in shariah law in which early Muslim clerics tried to base the system on the “perfect example” of their Prophet.