Read it.

Perhaps they realize that Trump is more likely to respond with troops than with apologies and free stuff.

Niall Ferguson scratches his head.

I was raised to believe in the equal rights of all people, regardless of sex, race, creed, or any other difference. That the human past was characterized by discrimination of many kinds is not news to me. But does it really constitute progress if the proponents of diversity resort to the behavior that was previously the preserve of sexists and racists?

Publishing the names and mugshots of conference speakers is the kind of thing anti-Semites once did to condemn the “over-representation” of Jewish people in academia. Terms such as “SausageFest” belong not in civil academic discourse but on urinal walls.

What we see here is the sexism of the anti-sexists; the racism of the anti-racists. In this “Through the Looking Glass” world, diversity means ideological homogeneity. “The whitesplaining of history is over,” declared another heated article by Satia last week. Hideous Newspeak terms such as “whitesplaining” and “mansplaining” are symptoms of the degeneration of the humanities in the modern university. Never mind the facts and reason, so the argument runs, all we need to know — if we don’t like what we hear — are the sex and race of the author.

Read it.

Some good advice.

Steve Sailer looks at David Reich’s new book.

Since then, an endless stream of anthropologists have assured us that race is just a social construct, that ancient peoples made pots not war, that Aryan conquests in India and Europe were Nazi delusions, that the caste system was imposed on the egalitarian Indians by British colonialists, and many other agreeable suppositions.

As Fitzgerald’s friend Hemingway ended The Sun Also Rises, “Isn’t it pretty to think so?”

But now the brilliant Harvard geneticist David Reich has published a bombshell scientific book, Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past, whose revelations would have been found congenial by a smarter version of Buchanan (such as Fitzgerald himself).

The Antiplanner points out some inconvenient truth.

The Antiplanner is frequently reminded of H.L. Mencken’s statement that “there is always a well-known solution to every human problem: neat, plausible, and wrong.” Millennials, for example, blame baby boomers for ruining the world. Most of the mistakes that baby boomers made were in adopting simple and plausible but wrong solutions to complex problems. Now the millennials are promoting their own simplistic and wrong solutions to the problems created by the baby boomer’s errors.

Read it.

Here’s a question for you: In 1950, would it have been possible for anyone to know all of the goods and services that we would have at our disposal 50 years later?

For example, who would have thought that we’d have cellphones, Bluetooth technology, small powerful computers, LASIK, and airplanes with 525-passenger seating capacity? This list could be extended to include thousands of goods and services that could not have been thought of in 1950.

In the face of this gross human ignorance, who should be in control of precursor goods and services? Seeing as it’s impossible for anyone to predict the future, any kind of governmental regulation should be extremely light-handed, so as not to sabotage technological advancement.

Compounding our ignorance is the fact that much of what we think we know is not true. Scientometrics is the study of measuring and analyzing science, technology, and innovation. It holds that many of the “facts” you know have a half-life of about 50 years. Let’s look at a few examples.

Read it.

This hasn’t gotten as much discussion as it deserves.

The left’s favorite bit of language manipulation is the inventing (or repurposing) of words and phrases that function as vague, nefarious placeholders for their grand political ambitions. (Think of them as linguistic Trojan Horses). The idea is to introduce a concept into mainstream thought using a word and phrases that, quite literally, have no fixed meaning. In fact, the more nebulous the term the better. Once this word or phrase becomes embedded in public discourse, it becomes the vehicle for a host of far-left progressive agendas. The lack of a concrete meaning makes the appropriated word or phrase ideal for whatever is currently in vogue with the left.

The most notable example of this technique is the infamous “social justice,” a word phrase that literally means whatever the hell you want it to mean. The social justice movement is in one way bone-jarringly idiotic. How can so many people latch on to a phrase that has no concrete meaning? In another way, the fact that progressives have been able to infect so many universities, public schools, and well-meaning people with the social justice virus is a marvel of political engineering.

My favorite leftist verbal sneak is the term ‘capitalism’. Coined by Marx to spit-tag the system he thought he was fighting against and picked up by people who ought to know better on the free-market side because they didn’t have anything to use in its place, it doesn’t describe anything in the real world and is useful only for the creation of hate-speech against people who think they ought to be able to do what they want rather than what the government wants.

Read it.

Let’s see whether any of the Usual Suspects chases the red dot.

Read it.

Which was the plan all along.

The proglodytes think they’re fooling people but they’re not.

Indeed not.

Read it.

The problem with democracy is that by its very nature the “inventors” tend to be philistines (for example, that grotesque trio: Zuckerberg, Gates, and Bezos), money-grubbers, and cowards, happy to truckle to the diversity rabble and other low types, since there is such a good living and so much social distinction in that. As with the preservation of high culture, it takes a truly elitist social order and an aristocratic tradition to produce statesmen such as those Great Dead White Men, America’s Founding Fathers.

Steve Sailer keeps finding Reality intruding on the media.

Here’s a brand new academic paper that makes the same point I immediately made back in 2013 when the New York Times first trumpeted Raj Chetty’s map of where there is high upward mobility of income: it didn’t look like a map of respectable regional attributes, such as a lack of Sprawl. Instead, it looked like a Map of Where the Blacks Aren’t.

Read it.

You knew it had to happen.

Next step: Suing Budweiser for pretending to be beer at all.

Read it.

I guess the Jews have gone back to being not-white people again.

Read it.

Couldn’t hurt. It would keep out some of the riff-raff, anyway.

Read it.

How about that Global Warming, eh?

I’m still not going to be happy until NYC is three feet under water.

Read it.

I don’t blame him — even thinking about Hillary makes me squirm.

I have a question: Find the black man in this picture:

For reference, here is a picture of an actual black man:

Makes sense to me.

Read it.

Can Global Warming be far behind?

Every time you see a bunch of Chicken Littles running around yelling the world is doomed, women and minorities hardest hit, etc., etc., remember that every single one of such disaster predictions has fizzled out. Every. Single. One.

Doug Kimball thinks it may be a Bad Thing.

From the employee’s perspective, this is not a positive trend. Mobility within an outsourced position is limited. You are hired to work in a specific company at a specific job, often reporting up to an employee of the company who has no authority or inclination to help your job trajectory. Outsourced staff are transformed into hyper-specialized clerks and workers and stuck in those positions with little leverage. There is no longer advancement or mobility as you are not an employee. It is not the traditional American “up or out” system. It has been replaced with the “do or done” system.

The old American idea of advancement from the mailroom to a window office is becoming impossible. Ambitious people now must migrate to rise as opportunities within companies have been eroded substantially by outsourcing trends. That’s probably ok as the half-life of corporations these days, where mergers, acquisitions, downsizings, reorganizations, consolidations, divestitures, and old-fashioned bankruptcies are as common as the holiday sale, is measured in dog years.

Since this is St Paddy’s day, I’ll quote a proverb much beloved by my Grandma Brennan: ‘God never closes a door but he opens a window.’ This trend may be bad news for ‘traditional’ employees, but it provides multiple opportunities for entrepreneurs to start up their own outsourcing services. It is quite common in tech fields for employees to think “These guys have their heads up their asses. It’s all corporate politics. I can do it for them and save them money.” And off they go. For a company to be working in an area and not appreciate what’s going on is legendary; think of Xerox PARC. Sure, it doesn’t provide an opportunity for employees who’d rather remain employees than go into business for  themselves (Me! Me!) but they can Go Along With their colleagues who are striking out. This has the potential to bring the Startup Disruption Mindset to more areas than just tech. Let’s see how it works out.

Troparion for St Patrick’s Day:

Holy Bishop Patrick, / Faithful shepherd of Christ’s royal flock, / You filled Ireland with the radiance of the Gospel: / The mighty strength of the Trinity! / Now that you stand before the Savior, / Pray that He may preserve us in faith and love!

Kontakion for St Patrick’s Day:

From slavery you escaped to freedom in Christ’s service: / He sent you to deliver Ireland from the devil’s bondage. / You planted the Word of the Gospel in pagan hearts. / In your journeys and hardships you rivaled the Apostle Paul! / Having received the reward for your labors in heaven, / Never cease to pray for the flock you have gathered on earth, / Holy bishop Patrick!

Read it.

Because we haven’t practiced it from childhood. Ask me a hard one.

If you had to squat to poop every day, you could do it, too. I’d rather have a chair and a toilet.

Read it.

This was a real eye-opener for me, although I’m sure most women are familiar with it.

If momma ain’t happy, ain’t nobody happy.

Baron Bodissey asks a good question.

I’ve taken a lot of flak over the past couple of days for referring to the current government of the UK as “totalitarian”. And with good reason — it’s not the right word to describe the repressive regime which is now in place in Britain. The task of suppressing free speech and independent opinion is not the government’s alone, but is also subcontracted to supposedly independent institutions of civil society, the media (especially social media) and the academy. It’s a full-court press across the whole of British culture, but without any obvious co-ordination by a centralized hierarchy headed by a strongman in the style of Stalin, Hitler, or Mao.

No, it’s a different system, and the word “totalitarian” does not do it justice. The word is too old-fashioned: It conjures up images of jackboots and concentration camps and firing squads, which are not necessary (so far) to accomplish the state’s purposes.

Sweden and Germany are much the same, and other Western European countries — France, Belgium, and the Netherlands — are almost as bad. All are using the same types of non-totalitarian methods to enforce an efficient, technologically advanced regimen of thought control. The current government of the UK is far more successful in its brainwashing of the populace than the Soviets or the Nazis could ever have dreamed of.

I think ‘totalitarian’ is accurate. It speaks more to the result than the cause.

Read it.

Compared with peer nations, the United States sends people to the hospital less often, it has a smaller share of specialist physicians, and it gives people about the same number of hospitalizations and doctors’ visits, according to a new study. The quality of health care looks pretty good, it finds, while its spending on social services outside of health care, like housing and education, looked fairly typical.

If you’ve been listening to many of the common narratives that seek to explain the high costs of America’s health system and the nation’s relatively low life expectancy, those results might surprise you. Analysts are fond of describing the system as wasteful, with too many patients getting too many services, driven by too many specialist doctors and too few social supports.

But a large and comprehensive review in The Journal of the American Medical Association punctures a lot of those pat explanations. The paper, conducted by a research team led by Ashish Jha, compiled detailed data from the health care systems of the United States and 10 other rich developed nations, and tried to test those hypotheses. The group included nations with single-payer health care systems, like Britain and Canada, and countries with competitive private insurance markets, like Switzerland and the Netherlands.

Read it.

Thank you, minimum wage.

Read it.

And then, by God, we will have our revenge!

Read it.

Rex Tillerson always looked like a total insider appratchik, the Deep State guy in Homeland Security who gets notified that Jason Bourne has been spotted in Prague.

Most letters can be much improved by judicious editing.

Read it.

Of course, he’s a Republican and therefore not a Real Negro.