Newsbusters.

Wikipedia handles the leftist propagandists at National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) with kid gloves, all while it bars editors from citing nearly every right-leaning media source.

The online encyclopedia revealed its true colors when it rated NPR and PBS as “generally reliable” in its permissible sources list for editors, despite ample evidence of the two publicly-funded media outlets’ flagrant bias. But Wikipedia rated every single right-leaning media outlet included in the list as “blacklisted,” “deprecated,” “generally unreliable” or “no consensus.” Both NPR and PBS are partially funded by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) and have been under the gun in Washington, D.C. due to their leftist bias and public funding.

Wikipedia assigns ratings ranging from “generally reliable” to literally “blacklisted” to determine whether and where publications can be cited on the online encyclopedia. In a previous report, MRC Free Speech America found that Wikipedia labeled 84 percent of the listed left-leaning media sources featured here as “generally reliable,” including NPR. Wikipedia then smeared 22 out of 29 right-leaning sources with negative labels, while the other seven fell under “no consensus.”

Tim Graham.

Is there any political schtick more tedious now than comparing President Donald Trump to Hitler? Politico posted an article noting Al Gore did this at a Climate Week event in San Francisco, and RealClearPolitics co-founder Tom Bevan tweeted with a smirk, “Gore says the same thing Democrats have been saying for a decade.”

The Democrats campaigned heavily in 2024 claiming Trump represented an end to democracy, and they lost the election. But it hasn’t slowed them down in the slightest.

The “independent fact-checkers” who act as a publicity arm of the Democrats never “fact-check” anyone calling Trump a “fascist” or comparing him to Hitler or Mussolini or Pol Pot or “insert mass-murdering dictator here.” PolitiFact screeches “Pants on Fire” when a Republican calls a Democrat a “socialist,” but “fascist” is always fair for categorizing conservatives.

Newsbusters.

The New York Times has a nasty, Soviet-style habit of putting political personalities they don’t approve of on the psychiatrist couch. Elisabeth Bumiller, writer at large for the New York Times and a former Washington Bureau Chief at the paper, issued a self-righteous, unprofessional screed in Monday’s “Washington Memo” slot, “In the Words of the Trump Billionaires Who Run the Economy,” in which she psychoanalyzed Trump-supporting billionaires and condemned them as soulless monsters bereft of empathy.

The opening sounds like something from a left-wing group’s press release, but this is a news story in the Times.

Read it.

Not just “Maryland Man”, but “Wrongfully Deported Maryland Man”. C’mon, guys, get with the program….

The BBC, a Voice of the Crust.

As US President Donald Trump takes aim at the Smithsonian Institution for “anti-American ideology”, Adam Rutherford examines what the science of genetics has taught us about race.

Genetics has a lot to teach us about ‘race’, but you won’t learn it here.

Adam Rutherford is a lecturer in genetics at Univeristy College London in the UK, BBC Presenter and author of How to Argue with a Racist, which examines the history and science of notions of race. You can read more from him about how to debunk racist myths with science and facts here.

This is just Woke propaganda dressed up as if it were Science. Anything that pretends there are differences between Europeans, Asians, and Africans is WAYCIST and therefore ipso facto false; that’s his story and he’s sticking to it.

Washington Free Beacon.

When a book’s dust jacket describes its author as an “award-winning investigative reporter” and the author begins by describing his work as “an investigative history of the modern Roman Catholic Church,” readers might expect that, by the end of the book, something strikingly new would have been revealed. But in this case (to borrow from Richard M. Nixon) “That would be wrong.” For Philip Shenon gives the game away two sentences later when he defines “the battle for the soul of the church” in these terms: “It pits Catholics desperate for a more tolerant church—one, that in the words of Pope John [XXIII], dispenses the medicine of mercy instead of severity—against those who see that vision as heresy.”

Right.

How Shenon came to that conclusion—the Platonic form of the New York Times’s view of the Catholic Church—is clarified in the book’s Acknowledgments where, after claiming the Catholic Church is more “secretive” than the Mossad, authorial thanks are rendered to a Who’s Who of the Catholic Left, living and dead. At the end of an extensive list of those who wrote books of papal history (12 of the 14 being firmly on the portside of things Catholic), the author gives a nod to my “deeply researched biographies of John Paul II”—after proffering a trigger warning that “I … fundamentally disagree with the views of the author George Weigel.” And while I’m mildly gratified that Philip Shenon thinks my books “important additions to [his] library,” that seems a low bar to overcome, given some of the fabulists (e.g., Malachi Martin) and progressive spin-doctors (e.g., Austen Ivereigh, the late Richard McBrien, Massimo Faggioli) whose work he evidently found far more agreeable.

The death of Pope Francis earlier today will exacerbate this division between the People Who Want Change and the People Who Don’t Want Change.

Newsbusters.

Disdain for President Donald Trump translates into a refusal to accept reality if doing it gives Trump a political victory. Examples include, but are certainly not limited to, the continuing assertion that Trump, about Charlottesville, said some variation of, “There were good and bad white nationalists and neo-Nazis on both sides”; the denial of the Hunter Biden laptop; that Trump “mocked” a disabled reporter; that Trump said to “drink bleach” to fight COVID; and that the Trump tax cuts “only benefit the rich.

Read it.

First error (everyone makes it, so I’m not picking on them): It’s not ‘America’s wealth’. It’s the wealth of the people who own it. This is the blatant indulgence of the Aggregation Fallacy that underlies Democrat politics: If it’s ‘America’s wealth’, then ‘America’ (i.e. the government) gets to determine how it’s ‘distributed’, right? Right?

Read it.

Oh Guardian, thou unerring oracle of elite anguish and latte-laced righteousness, what have you conjured this time? A new revelation from the high temple of emotional climatology: climate change is no longer about physics, but “a crisis of justice.” Yes, really. The headline of Friederike Otto’s latest opus in The Guardian shrieks like an undergraduate activist with a bullhorn: “Climate change is not just a problem of physics but a crisis of justice.” Because when your models don’t model reality, and your predictions flop harder than a tofu burger at a Texas BBQ, simply pivot the narrative—from science to sociology.

The New York Times, a Voice of the Crust.

“We’re going to fix the birthrate decline in this room,” said the dating app entrepreneur Amanda Bradford, facing a hotel conference room filled with men in blazers and slacks, men ready to offer up their wisdom on the mishaps of modern dating. All these apps, all these swipes, all these meet-ups and make-outs and just not enough babies. This room was ready to fix it. Or at least, given the audience demographics, to dutifully do its part.

Apparently, Woke scribbler Emma Goldberg is not among that number. Ashley St Clair is certainly doing her part, with two out-of-wedlock births with separate fathers.

It was late March in Austin and roughly 200 people had flown in for the Natal Conference, an event devoted to discussing collapsing fertility rates. There were churchgoing conservatives and Silicon Valley technologists, parents of five and parents of nine, edgelords in leather jackets and women in Lilly Pulitzer, all sharing a common concern: how to convince Americans, namely American women, to have more babies. At the Friday evening reception, as attendees mingled over wine in the domed entrance of the Bullock Texas State History Museum, a 31-year-old woman remarked with a twinge of concern that there did not appear to be all that many people wearing yellow wristbands, meaning the singles. Another guest said the room seemed heavily male.

Where else would men look for potential wives and mothers? Certainly not amongst the staff of the Narrative Media.

Read it.

The New York Times’s mustachioed “China for a Day” propagandist Thomas Friedman is having a nervous breakdown because President Donald Trump isn’t a climate change nut like he is. And true-to-form, he’s simping for the Chi-Coms to get Trump… Again.

“I Have Never Been More Afraid for My Country’s Future,” read Friedman’s grossly embellished April 15 item that was plastered on A22 of his newspaper’s April 17 print edition. After bellyaching over  the allegedly “[s]o much crazy [that] happens with the Trump administration every day,” Friedman then freaked over Trump’s April 8 decision “to sign an executive order to bolster coal mining.”

I guess His Country is Red China. Good to know.

Huffington Post, a Propaganda Organ of the Wokerati.

Who is this ‘we’ of whom she speaks? I know of no Republican who is afraid of Trump retaliation.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) says Congress is failing its constitutional role of being a check on the executive branch as Donald Trump’s administration continues to unilaterally kill government programs, freeze spending and lay off thousands of federal workers.

Exactly as it failed to be a check on a long line of Dramacrat Presidents, regarding which Murkowski was notably silent.

The changes are producing “head-spinning” anxiety in and out of government, she said, particularly in a place like Alaska that is so reliant on federal funding

And it’s that sort of pork-barrel spending that Murkowski depends on to keep her job.

“We are all afraid,” Murkowski told Alaska nonprofit leaders on Wednesday, according to The Anchorage Daily News. “It’s quite a statement. But we are in a time and a place where I certainly have not been here before.

Yeah, a Republican President who acts like a Republican President. Quell horreur!

And I’ll tell ya, I’m oftentimes very anxious myself about using my voice, because retaliation is real. And that’s not right.”

If she were a real Republican, she would have nothing to worry about. Being, however, a RINO and semi-Democrat, she is right to be afraid.

Read it.

he illegal migrant at the center of a deportation controversy held a rank and street name with the notorious MS-13 gang, court documents showed.

The Trump administration has alleged that Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was arrested in Maryland and deported from the U.S., was an MS-13 member. He was sent to El Salvador despite an immigration court order preventing his deportation.

According to newly released documents, Abrego Garcia held the rank “Chequeo” and the street name “Chele” within the vicious criminal organization.

The Narrative Media obfuscate this by invariably calling him “Maryland Man”, as if he was just plucked from off the street for no reason whatsoever than Orange Man Bad.

UPDATE: Biden’s FBI Ordered TN Highway Patrol to Release ‘Maryland Man’ Recently Deported to El Salvador After He Was Detained in 2022 Traffic Stop on Suspicion of Human Trafficking

UPDATE: Who Is Abrego Garcia? What Court Petition and Police Report Reveal

UPDATE: Telemundo Reporter Mad About Having To Interrupt ‘Maryland Dad’ Advocacy by Covering Rachel Morin’s Mom

UPDATE: ‘Maryland man’ Kilmar Abrego Garcia exposed in police records as ‘violent’ repeat wife beater

Read it.

On April 2, Trump proclaimed, “Liberation Day” and added a global baseline tariff of 10%, plus customized so-called “reciprocal tariffs.” Because the 2024 U.S. deficit with the E.U. was 39% of imports, he imposed a “discounted” 20% reciprocal tariff on most E.U. goods not subject to the 25% tariff. After a week, excluding China, Trump suspended reciprocal tariffs for 90 days to facilitate negotiations, and the E.U. delayed its retaliation.

While this may appear to be Trump starting a trade war, in reality it’s Trump ratcheting up a long-simmering war against the United States fought with protectionist trade policies, including by some of our closest allies. Set aside that Trump’s reciprocal tariffs are actually punitive tariffs, that the trade war is depressing global stock and bond markets, raising the specter of recession, and threatening U.S. economic primacy. Those are criticisms largely based on trying to do too much, too quickly. Turning to the disease, Trump is right. We sometimes are treated better by our enemies than by our so-called trade allies. That’s before counting the trillions of dollars America has spent on their defense.

…

High tariffs are not Europe’s main offense. Instead, the E.U. deters U.S. competition by requiring American companies to comply on a worldwide basis with its far-left antitrust, censorship, data privacy, and DEI rules; limits government purchasing to products with at least 50% local components and E.U. ownership; and sets standards for non-E.U. companies that vary country-by-country, making it prohibitively expensive to do business in the E.U.

Read it.

The media got very excited when the Pennsylvania governor’s mansion was firebombed because they were hoping it was going to be somebody with the ‘wrong’ politics, but instead the perpetrator, Cody Balmer, was a self-proclaimed “socialist” who claimed that he did it to tell Gov. Josh Shapiro that he “will not take part in his plans for what he wants to do to the Palestinian people.”

A socialist who indulges in violence. My, what a surprise.

Now Balmer seems like a nutjob, but had he been a nutjob with the wrong politics, we’d never stop hearing about it, but now he’s likely to get a whole lot less attention because he did it for the ‘right reasons’.

And there’s a pattern to this stuff.

There is indeed.

The New York Times, a Voice of the Crust.

David [“Camera”] Hogg, a young liberal activist and now a vice chair of the Democratic National Committee, is leading an effort to unseat the party’s older lawmakers in primaries.

Good news for Republicans. The younger (and more unhinged) Dramacrat politicians become, the more people will vote for the adults in the room.

Newsbusters.

Having been roundly condemned in the days leading up to its premiere and an excerpt flirting with far-left, pro-murder psychopath Taylor Lorenz, CNN correspondent Donie O’Sullivan’s Whole Story episode aired Sunday on “a new kind of American extremism” declaring “violence in the country today is mostly from right-wing extremism” with “simply no equivalent on the left.”

Unsurprisingly, it was pants-on-fire false as O’Sullivan chose to ignore both assassination attempts on now-President Trump, arson attacks on pro-life groups, the Family Research Council shooting, the rampant anti-Semitism inside college campuses, and the 2017 attempted murder of congressional Republicans by a man who was both a Bernie Sanders supporter and MSNBC viewer.

O’Sullivan instead created a strawman fixating like a crazy ex on January 6 defendants, far right figures with vile views who made a point of threatening O’Sullivan’s life, and a designer of 3D-printed guns. Oh, and the now-viral sit-down smiling and giggling with Lorenz about her support for Luigi Mangione, the alleged killer of United HealthCare CEO Brian Thompson.

Read it.

You can’t make this shit up.

The Bullshitwark, a Voice of the Crust.

William Kriston loses his shit.

Jennifer Rubin loses her shit.

Salon, a Voice of the Crust.

Amanda Marcotte loses her shit.

Read it.

If they didn’t do it for Biden, they certainly won’t do it for Trump.

Read it.

Over the last few days, I’ve been part of an extraordinarily small contingency of people not freaking out and losing their minds over President Trump’s new tariff plan or the ensuing stock market pullback.

A couple of days ago, I argued that the media shrieking hysterically about how the world was ending as a result of this trade policy was nothing more than a visceral reaction to what was happening in the stock market. It had to be. With just hours having passed since the implementation of Trump’s tariff policy, there was no real way to judge its success based on the merits.

Said another way, these things take time.

The New York Times, a Voice of the Crust.

Donald Trump’s 2024 election sent many finance types into spasms of anticipatory ecstasy as they imagined freedom from regulations, taxes and unfamiliar pronouns. “Bankers and financiers say Trump’s victory has emboldened those who chafed at ‘woke doctrine’ and felt they had to self-censor or change their language to avoid offending younger colleagues, women, minorities or disabled people,” The Financial Times reported a few days before Trump’s inauguration. It quoted one leading banker crowing — anonymously — about finally being able to use slurs like “retard” again. The vibes had shifted; the animal spirits were loose.

“We’re stepping into the most pro-growth, pro-business, pro-American administration I’ve perhaps seen in my adult lifetime,” gushed the hedge fund manager Bill Ackman in December.

One Wall Street veteran, however, understood the risk an unleashed Trump posed to the economy. After Trump’s victory in November, Peter Berezin, chief global strategist at BCA Research, which provides macroeconomic research to major financial institutions, estimated that the chance of a recession had climbed to 75 percent. “The prospect of an escalation of the trade war is likely to depress corporate investment while lowering real household disposable income,” said a BCA report.

Never has a journalist demonstrated more convincingly an inferior mind. Goldberg thinks that ‘Wall Street’ (the Economic Crust) rejoiced in Trump’s election because it would free their Inner Nazi, and then pivots to saying that They Were Wrong because of tariffs, completely missing the fact that (a) she’s reading into their motivations what she pretends they wanted and (b) that there is some connection between her fanciful notions of their mindset and Trump’s actions regarding trade.

Well, if ‘Wall Street’ got Trump wrong, it was because they believed the Narrative Media about who Trump was rather than believing the most sure evidence, what he said and did. But we have no evidence other than Goldberg’s proglodyte fantasies that such a thing happened. Trump has made no secret about his views on economics and trade. Most billionaires are much smarter than journalists like Goldberg, who has been a scribbler all her life and never had a job that required her to do something that would make people’s lives better.

Trump is not imposing tariffs just because he likes tariffs, although he claims he does. The tariffs were in response to other countries imposing tariffs on U.S. goods while expecting the U.S. to be Free Trade Land, and Trump isn’t going to put up with it. Once the moaners and weepers back off on their tariffs, Trump will lower his; he has made that quite clear on more than one occasion, despite the Usual Suspects wringing their hands about how he’s attempting to destroy America. (People would believe that of a Dramacrat, but not of Trump.)

The Times actually pays people to write this shit. Unbelievable.

NBC News, a Voice of the Crust.

The Trump administration is considering launching drone strikes on drug cartels in Mexico as part of an ambitious effort to combat criminal gangs trafficking narcotics across the southern border, according to six current and former U.S. military, law enforcement and intelligence officials with knowledge of the matter.

Discussions among White House, Defense Department and intelligence officials, which are still at an early stage, have included possible drone strikes against cartel figures and their logistical networks in Mexico with the cooperation of Mexico’s government, the sources said.

Still, the administration has made no final decision and reached no definitive agreement about countering the cartels. And unilateral covert action, without Mexico’s consent, has not been ruled out and could be an option of last resort, the sources said. It is unclear whether American officials have floated the possibility of drone strikes to the Mexican government.

Newsbusters.

If you got all of your news from CNN and MSNBC, you’d have a higher than 50/50 chance of believing the Trump administration had accidentally arrested and deported a naturalized American citizen living in Maryland, and for no particular reason.

Cable networks CNN and MSNBC have hopelessly twisted the story of an El Salvadoran illegal alien who recently was deported by the Trump administration. Over the past week, these two networks have referred to Kilmar Abrego-Garcia as a “Maryland man” or “Maryland father” a whopping 120 times, while identifying him as an illegal alien only seven times. Meanwhile, MSNBC alone aired thirteen objectively false assertions that Garcia was actually a legal resident.

MRC analysts looked at all coverage of Kilmar Abrego-Garcia’s deportation to El Salvador on CNN and MSNBC, from April 1 through April 6. In that time, the networks aired a combined 72 stories about Garcia (40 on MSNBC, 32 on CNN).

CNN referred to Garcia using terms such as “Maryland man” and “Maryland father” 51 times. Across the 32 news stories about him last week, only a single segment (3%) contained any mention he was in the country illegally, and just thirteen (41%) even bothered to mention he was from El Salvador, not America.

On MSNBC, Garcia was referred to by terms like “Maryland father” an absurd 69 times. Throughout the 40 segments discussing his deportation, his illegal status was mentioned in just six (15%), and only twelve segments (30%) pointed out that he was from El Salvador.

The Washington Poop, a Voice of the Crust.

Because, as we all know, Americans will have neither health nor safety unless it is provided by the Federal government bureaucracy.

The Washington Poop, a Voice of the Crust.

Last December, after months of worried research and work, we converted our Northern California home from gas to electric. We expected a bunch of benefits: Healthier indoor temperatures and air quality. A reduced carbon footprint. Lower energy bills.

The results have been more complicated.

Making decisions based on politics when they ought to be based on economics always costs you money.

Read it.

On Friday [5 April], Dr. Peter Marks announced his resignation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as Director of CEBR (Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research) citing differences with Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kennedy regarding vaccines. The New York Times, Washington Post, and other media outlets such as STAT News breathlessly reported that “FDA’s top vaccine scientist had been pushed out.” We have been told that science is at risk. The irony of these reports is that Marks didn’t resign and is not a vaccine scientist. Dr. Marks was asked to leave and then subsequently wrote that he did not want to become “subservient to [Secretary Kennedy’s] misinformation and lies.”

The media proclamation that Dr. Marks’ is “FDA’s top vaccine scientist” is ironic because he decided to give himself that position. Marks is a physician but has no clinical or scientific training in vaccines or immunology. Dr. Marks trained as an oncologist, a field far from the important and complex area of vaccine biology. At FDA in 2021, Dr. Marks removed top career vaccine scientists so he could force through the approval of the COVID vaccine to meet an arbitrary Biden administration deadline. He also declined to convene the FDA Vaccine Advisory Committee to review his decision. These events are clearly outlined in the June 2023 House Judiciary Hearings. Marks ousted Dr. Gruber and Dr. Krause, the top scientists at the Office of Vaccine Research, due to “intransigence” of these real vaccine experts to not ram through the approval of the vaccine. Drs. Gruber and Krause had voiced concerns that they needed more time to understand the safety of the vaccine especially as it relates to inflammation of the heart, now a well known and accepted toxicity of the COVID vaccine. Marks approved the use of the vaccine in children despite the known fact that children have an extremely low risk of serious health effects of COVID-19 infection and yet a known significant increased risk of serious vaccine related toxicity.

The Other McCain.

When I first encountered the online buzz around the new Netflix series Adolescence, I didn’t have a strong reaction. Streaming services have replaced TV and movies as the primary pop culture sources of entertainment, but it’s been many years since I paid much attention to such things. My idea of “entertainment” is YouTube videos of Arkansas State Police doing PIT maneuvers — reality being far more interesting to me than the fictional product of some screenwriter’s imagination.

What I did know about Adolescence was that it is set in England, and that the screenwriters had essentially reversed the races of contemporary crime trends in the United Kingdom, by making a white boy the knife-wielding killer. Despite the news media’s reluctance to deal with this honestly, anyone who pays attention to crime news out of Britain knows who is implicated in the surge of stabbing sprees there. It’s not a secret.

Newsbusters.

Are NPR and PBS biased? Should they receive taxpayer funding? Don’t ask Google. The company’s AI chatbot showed its bias when it answered by simply pushing the leftist legacy media outlets in question.

Google showed a clear bias when MRC researchers asked “Are NPR and PBS biased?” and “Should NPR and PBS be defunded?” on March 25 and April 1. In its answers to the two prompts, Gemini cited NPR, PBS and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (which both NPR and PBS are funded by in part) as sources nearly 59 percent of the time (a combined total of 17 times out of 29 sources listed). Gemini’s responses included only six links that did not favor taxpayer-funded public media like PBS or NPR. This is a continuation of a similar tactic used by Gemini last week, the day before NPR and PBS executives were brought before members of Congress to answer for their networks’ biased reporting. Neither prompt cited a single article by the Media Research Center, which has produced countless reports on the bias at NPR and PBS over the last 30+ years.

“When it comes to NPR and PBS, Google’s bias could not be more clear here,” said NewsBusters Executive Editor Tim Graham. “Aside from perhaps NPR itself, no media entity has expended more ink over the decades on the question of NPR and PBS’s bias than the Media Research Center, and yet, at no point did Google even deign to mention the MRC as a source for either prompt. But this is just Google’s usual modus operandi, isn’t it?”

Read it.

Contrary to widespread media reports, the investigation said that no manifesto existed.

“In this case, a manifesto didn’t exist. Hale never left behind a single document explaining why she committed the attack, why she specifically targeted The Covenant, and what she hoped to gain, if anything, with the attack,” the Nashville police report states.

Instead, the shooter, Audrey Hale, left behind “a series of notebooks, art composition books, and media files created by Hale documenting her planning and preparation for the attack, the events in her life that motivated her to commit the attack, and her hopes regarding the outcome of the attack,” police determined.

The New York Times, a Voice of the Crust.

They say that like it was a bad thing.

In this particular case ‘will lose access to’ actually means ‘can’t get the government to pay something that they ought to be paying for themselves’. To those who believe that people ought to take responsibility for their own actions, this is a feature, not a bug.

William Kristol, the Bulwark (a Voice of the Crust).

The fact that The Bulwark is writing about some poor guy who got shipped to El Salvador by mistake, a mistake that can easily be corrected by shipping him back, rather than the Jewish hostages in the custody of Hamas, who are being tortured even as we speak and have no assurance of making it out alive, tells you everything you need to know about the Kristol Krew.

UPDATE: “Maryland Father” Or MS-13 Migrant Gangster. Which Is It, MSM?

I guess the guy isn’t so innocent after all. Not that Kristol kares.

The Foundry.

When I first came across Jonathan Chait’s new Atlantic piece, “Why the COVID Reckoning Is So One-Sided,” I assumed the answer would be that Democrats had been the ones relentlessly and tragically wrong about virtually everything during the pandemic. No such luck.

In Chait’s telling, the Left remains uncannily open-minded, always striving for truth, while the dogmatic Right remains hopelessly bogged down in “pathological incuriosity.” Even when conservatives are right, they’re right in the wrong way.

These days, people on the Left, Chait contends, “have engaged in searching self-reflection—on school closings, the lab leak hypothesis, the political aftereffects, and other unanticipated lessons. Conservatives have used the occasion to engage in a round of self-congratulations and taunting of the libs.”

Now, you and I may believe dunking on libs who accused you of committing mass murder for going to church is perfectly normal behavior. Chait, though, is irked by all the “gloating” and “football-spiking.” Especially because a handful of left-wing outlets have published columns (five years late) begrudgingly admitting that lockdowns were a failure.

A few writers on the Left are realiably wrong about everything they discuss: Paul Krugman, Jennifer Rubin, Amanda Marcotte, Greg Sargent, Will Bunch, Philip Bump … and Jonathan Chait. They’re totally right, everyone they disagree with is totally wrong, and that attitude persists even when they change their minds about something. People on the Right should Know Their Place and Mend Their ways, like David French and the Kristol Krew over at The Bulwark.

The New York Times, a Voice of the Crust.

Since when is it the job of U.S. taxpayers to pay for earthquake response in Myanmar?

Philadelphia Inquirer, a Voice of the Crust.

Will Bunch loses his shit.

Read it.

Somebody didn’t get the memo.

The Times.

Hassan Sentamu endured a traumatic childhood and was prone to violence but months before murdering a 15-year-old girl things had seemed to be improving.

Of course, in the movie they had to make the kid a native white Briton and shift the plot to make it all about ‘incels’.

Wired, a Voice of the Crust.

For Wired, there is no Right but the Far-Right.

To find a woman who isn’t a feminist, doesn’t have purple hair or tattoos or piercings or fake body parts, and might want to go to church every now and then is probably worth $10,000.

Organizers behind A pronatalist conference with far-right ties in Austin, Texas, this weekend have set up matchmaking events for attendees that include the option of getting married onsite as part of their greater effort to repopulate the world, WIRED has learned.

Certainly the party of abortion and birth control and not-having-kids-to-save-the-planet can’t be depended upon to do so

According to its website, the sold-out Natal Conference, taking place March 28-29 at a hotel operated by the University of Texas at Austin, has “no political or ideological goal other than a world in which our children can have grandchildren.” But the event, an earlier version of which was promoted by Elon Musk, features speakers like Pizzagate conspiracy theorist Jack Posobiec and Crémieux, an online pseudonym linked, according to The Guardian, to Jordan Lasker, who discusses falling birthrates and promotes eugenics.

Dunh dunh DUNHHHHHHH….  (So what?) I would hardly call The Guardian a reliable source, although it certainly shares the same ideological space as Wired has emigrated to from it’s earlier incarnation as a tech journal.

Natal Conference organizer Kevin Dolan, a father of at least six, according to Politico, has previously stated that eugenics—the belief that white people are genetically superior—and the pronatalist movement are “very much aligned.”

*sigh* Eugenics is not ‘the belief that white people are genetically superior’ (although I’m sure Margaret Sanger, patron saint of Planned Parenthood, thought so). Where do they get these ignorant spurgs? They actually pay people to write this shit.

CBS News, a Voice of the Crust.

My, what a surprise.

Read it.

The problem is, it’s all they’ve got.

The New York Times, a Voice of the Crust.

An executive order signed by the president would cancel collective bargaining for hundreds of thousands of workers, the largest federal employees union said. The union was preparing legal action.

Of course it is. I don’t recall when unions became allowed for government workers–when I was younger, that was illegal–but I suspect that the growth of sclerotic government was greatly accelerated by unionization, as has been its effect on business that a chock full o’ unions. Unions have always been one of the pillars of the Dramacrat party, teachers’ unions and government worker unions (which overlap a great deal) being notable stalwarts.

The inherent bias of the NYT is evident by the way they refer to ‘union protections’, as if unions were the only thing keeeping government workers from being kept in peonage.

The American Federation of Government Employees, the largest federal workers union, estimated that the order would strip labor protections from hundreds of thousands of civil servants, and said it was preparing legal action.

There were extensive civil service protections in place for government workers before unions, and probably will remain after unions are dust.

The New York Times, a Voice of the Crust.

The intelligence breach was bad enough, current and former fighter pilots said. But Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s refusal to acknowledge that he should not have disclosed sensitive information about when American fighter pilots would attack sites in Yemen, they said, was even worse.

On air bases, in aircraft carrier “ready rooms” and in communities near military bases this week, the news that senior officials in the Trump administration discussed plans for an impending attack on Signal, a commercial messaging app, angered and bewildered men and women who have taken to the air on behalf of the United States.

The mistaken inclusion of the editor in chief of The Atlantic in the chat and Mr. Hegseth’s insistence that he did nothing wrong by disclosing the secret plans upend decades of military doctrine about operational security, a dozen Air Force and Navy fighter pilots said.

Note that they were endangered, not by anyone in the Trump administration, but by the ‘journalist’ that this writer for the NYT seems to admit was a probable traitor who would publish any information that he found out, however classified. Of course, the Time has to spin this as a problem with the administration, whereas the real problem is the apparatchiks of the Narrartive Media who can be depended upon to blab any classified information they come across to the four winds–and America’s enemies.

Read it.

Remember in 2006 when Al Gore released An Inconvenient Truth and made lots of frightening claims about climate change, none of which came true?

Politico, a Voice of the Crust.

“Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”  – 118 USC Ch 115.

This looks to be treason. straight up.

UPDATE: ‘It is highly classified’: Hegseth leaked sensitive attack details, former officials say (Politico)

If true, this merely underscores the treasonable nature of publicizing this information.

Read it.

Tonight’s NBC Nightly News reporting on the Senate hearing to confirm business executive Frank Bisignano as head of the Social Security Administration had a familiar sound to it. If you listen closely enough, you’ll hear the kind of fearmongering that was a staple of a bygone era.

If you listen closely enough, you’ll get taken back to the late ‘aughts and early teens, when Democrat messaging centered around scaring seniors into believing that evil Republicans were out to gut Social Security. One widely mocked ad featured a Paul Ryan lookalike wheeling an elderly woman to a cliff and throwing her right off.

This is, basically, the tone of Ryan Nobles’ item on Bisignano’s confirmation hearing. Nobles found a willing senior to play the role of frightened grandma as he advocated on behalf of the program, casting President Donald Trump and Tesla/SpaceX founder Elon Musk as the proverbial Paul Ryans holding Grandma’s wheelchair at the cliff’s edge.

In order to be credible, this report relies both on a willing suspension of disbelief and on a major omission: President Trump’s own commitment to preserve Social Security and Medicare. None of this gets mentioned at any point in the report. Instead, Nobles interchanges efficiency cuts with cuts to the program itself. Deceptive stuff intent on scaring seniors into voting Democrat. The Resistance Media is in high gear.

The Narrative Media have never shown any reluctance to lie if it would help advance the proglodyte agenda. It’s what they do.

UK Daily Record.

The Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg was accidentally added to the group in the highly-encrypted messaging app, where he became privy to top-secret war plans.

And apparently just couldn’t wait to make these ‘top secret war plans’ public. That’s modern ‘journalism’ for you.

UPDATE: Atlantic editor suggests he’s open to sharing Hegseth’s full war plans texts publicly (The Hill) Which is treason.