DYSPEPSIA GENERATION

We have seen the future, and it sucks.

The Speech Police Tackle a Subdivision

26th April 2008

George Will is on the case.

The two real rationales for laws regulating political activity are incumbent protection and the convenience of government — discouraging the governed from activism. The proclaimed rationale is, however, the prevention of corruption or the appearance thereof. But corruption is understood in terms of quid pro quo transactions — candidates corrupted by contributions. So, there cannot be corruption in ballot issue elections because there are no candidates to corrupt.

Undeterred by this detail, advocates of political regulation say compulsory disclosure of involvement even in ballot issue campaigns — meaning compulsory denial of political privacy — is inherently good because information always is, too. The regulator’s motto is “Dirigo, ergo sum” — I boss people around, therefore I am.

Comments are closed.