DYSPEPSIA GENERATION

We have seen the future, and it sucks.

Gay marriage v. gay mafia: The best defense is a good offense

7th June 2012

Steve Sailer persists in asking the questions no one else will ask, and throwing some daylight on the mainstreaming of abnormality.

“The best defense is a good offense” may explain much of the otherwise puzzling gay marriage project. Gay Liberation unleashed a number of Big Gay Screw-Ups, such as AIDS and the Catholic Church scandals. But rather than admit that, it was much easier emotionally to just go on the offensive over some random issue like gay marriage.
There are big advantages to having the press constantly up in arms about how you  are a victim of discrimination. For example, it can help cover up your own discriminating. Many industries appear to have, as Marc Ambinder admitted yesterday about Washington D.C., gay mafias discriminating against non-gays. That’s usually laughed off, as Ambinder and Robert Wright did, with the assumption that the victims of discrimination are straight men, so that’s A-okay.
But what happens when the victims are members of a Designated Victim Group? For example, most of the competition in the fashion business is between gay men and women, and that industry’s powerful gay mafia notoriously treats aspiring female designers badly.

4 Responses to “Gay marriage v. gay mafia: The best defense is a good offense”

  1. Dennis Nagle Says:

    “Steve Sailer persists in asking the questions no one else will ask” Really? I must have heard at least a dozen right-leaning talking heads asking the same question or some variation on it.

    All of which boil down to one basic question: Why don’t gays just stay quiet in the back of the bus? Or better yet, get off. It’s not as if they’re human, after all…

  2. Tim of Angle Says:

    And it’s not as if they’re more than 2% of the population – they only fill one seat on the bus, but insist on having their own special section.

  3. Whitehawk Says:

    “And it’s not as if they’re more than 2% of the population – they only fill one seat on the bus, but insist on having their own special section.”

    Yea, where the driver used to sit.

  4. Dennis Nagle Says:

    “…but insist on having their own special section.”
    And exactly how is finally gaining the priveleges that everyone else already enjoys equate to getting a ‘special section’? If anything, they’re trying to get out of the ‘special section’ marked Second Class.