The Myth of ‘Marriage Equality’
9th April 2015
‘Marriage Equality’ is the trendy phrase homosexuals have come up with for their campaign to redefine the term ‘marriage’, attempting to piggyback on the good vibes that everyone has about the Civil Rights movement and ‘gender equality’. But, like every such tendentious weasel-phrase, it is a lie masquerading as a ‘greater truth’.
The simple fact is that homosexuals have, and always have had, ‘marriage equality’ — they have, and always have had, the same right to marry a person of the opposite sex than heterosexuals have, and always have had.
But that’s not what they want. They want a ‘right’ that no one, homosexual or heterosexual, has or has ever had: The right to ‘marry’ someone of the same sex. They call it ‘marriage equality’ so as to deceive the people on the left side of the bell curve (whose votes are just as good as yours). And a comparable status to marriage, with all of the same legal rights and benefits, isn’t enough; only a radical (reaching to the roots) re-definition of the settled ancient term ‘marriage’ will do.
So the next time you hear or read the phrase ‘marriage equality’, know it for what it is — a lie, dressed up to look like the truth.
April 9th, 2015 at 09:52
I’ve been saying this for a couple of years. Told Nagle back in the day it is not about equality. It is about changing morality. The Gay Agenda in not about coexistence. It’s about destroying any opposition to their quest to change our heritage and moral foundation.
Gay marriage is not about partner exclusivity either by the way…
If it is about equality then why doesn’t the apposition have “equal” say in “defining” marriage (as if it isn’t already defined). We have not had an equal say in defining the most important institution in our society. When put to the ballot Gay marriage goes down to defeat by 60% consistently only to be ruled unconstitutional by a liberal, sympathetic judge. It has been changed by by judicial fiat and coercing spineless legislatures. Veiled threats and intimidation have dominated the movement. Bullying businesses small and large who don’t have a budget for this kind of legal defense of their livelihood.
How long are we going to sit on our hands?
April 9th, 2015 at 11:03
On an unrelated note…
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/kristine-marsh/2015/04/03/why-isnt-media-going-after-muslim-bakeries#.VSXt01ETpsY.facebook