DYSPEPSIA GENERATION

We have seen the future, and it sucks.

The Rising Tide of War

16th November 2012

Read it.

It has not been two weeks since the president’s reelection and already foreign policy crises are metastasizing. Israel’s justified retaliation at Hamas rocket attacks from the Gaza Strip may escalate into the second Gaza war in four years.

But the Middle East of 2012 is not the Middle East of 2008. Gaza neighbors an Egypt governed not by the secular dictatorship of Hosni Mubarak but by the religious-inspired democracy of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Mohamed Morsi.

My, what a surprise! Aren’t you surprised? I’m sure surprised.

The credibility of the military and intelligence establishment has suffered a grave blow at a critical juncture. A second Obama term will see new, and most likely more dovish, faces at Defense, State, and CIA. Obama seems inclined to replace Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton with loyalist hacks. These replacements will have to negotiate the complicated internal politics of bureaucracies as they attempt to implement Obama’s questionable policies.

Well, it’s not as if those areas were of any concern to Obama — he’s too busy passing out favors to his union and enviro-nazi supporters to notice.

A responsible press would be relentless in its exploration of these important issues. The press we have is still giggling over post-election comments made by Paul Ryan and Mitt Romney and basking in the Republican Party’s quadrennial bout of self-examination. One reporter went out of her way during Wednesday’s press conference to congratulate the president on his reelection—just another member of the team!

They’re not called the Axis of Drivel for nothing.

One Response to “The Rising Tide of War”

  1. Dennis Nagle Says:

    “Obama seems inclined to replace Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton with loyalist hacks.”
    But the conservatives have been calling Panetta and Clinton loyalist hacks for years.
    So what would be different in their view? What makes this news?

    “A responsible press” is evidently codespeak for ‘a press that reports on and investigates things that I think are important’.
    Sorry, but it’s not always about you.