DYSPEPSIA GENERATION

We have seen the future, and it sucks.

It’s Time to Break Up Syria

25th June 2017

Read it.

Whether it’s the deployment of special forces against ISIS or firing Tomahawk missiles against Bashar al-Assad, regardless of which faction is eliminated or who is removed from their position of power, the likelihood of stabilizing Syria is low. The country has traveled too far down a path that no amount of international goodwill can bring back. “Syria,” as it was previously known, is dead. Investing in an attempt to revive the pre-war status quo of a unitary state is a fool’s errand, which will drain immense resources, drag out the suffering of the people and distract the international community from seeking more achievable goals. The limited capacity of the international community (both resources and will), the conflicting geopolitical interests, and the depth of animosity among people on the ground mean that a strategy premised upon a return to the Syria that once was is bound to fail.

,,,

Our argument for the breakup of Syria isn’t a call to revisit the Sykes-Picot Agreement and the subsequent Treaty of Sèvres—in which Western nations mapped out the current Middle East, ignoring what the local people wanted—but rather to recognize that borders are not immutable and are a function of an ever-evolving history, culture and politics. The century-long map of the Middle East, for better or worse, served the region during the interwar period and the subsequent postcolonial transitions, but the internal pressures that had been contained by strongman dictatorships, with the support of various foreign governments, can no longer be held back. Persisting with the status quo in Syria without acknowledging these challenges and realistically considering the likelihood of a sustainable peace will lead to a far worse situation.

One Response to “It’s Time to Break Up Syria”

  1. Melampus the Seer Says:

    Let me guess. Eastern Syria must break away….so the gas pipeline can be built. Syria refused to allow it because it would become a magnet for terrorism, and then by a strange coincidence Syria became the USAs number one target for regime change.

    Before who was it? Oh yes, Libya. A country that couldn’t project power to its own borders became the number one terror regime, and was target number one for regime change. After accepting payment for oil in gold, undermining the petrodollar system.

    Coincidences? I think not.