DYSPEPSIA GENERATION

We have seen the future, and it sucks.

South African State Broadcaster Bans Negative News About Embattled President Zuma

28th June 2016

Read it.

Staff at The South African Broadcasting Corporation were reportedly told that at least 80 per cent of all news coverage had to be positive, and that negative stories around the president were banned.

South Africa is well on its way to being Just Another Corrupt African Dictatorship.

An example of why having one government-controlled news service is a Bad Idea. (Yeah, I’m looking at you, Britain.)

2 Responses to “South African State Broadcaster Bans Negative News About Embattled President Zuma”

  1. Sis Says:

    Which is worse: Government-censored media, or self-censoring media?

  2. RealRick Says:

    No matter what event takes place – particularly political events – all of the American news media will report the exact same information. (Occasionally, FoxNews will deviate from that – and you can tell when they do it by the howls from the Left.)

    That is simply not possible unless they all have exactly the same agenda.

    As others have said, “We don’t have a two party system. There is only one party and we’re not invited.”