DYSPEPSIA GENERATION

We have seen the future, and it sucks.

The Spread of ‘Debate is Over’ Syndrome

21st April 2014

Joel Kotkin hears his bullshit detector go off.

The ongoing trial involving journalist Mark Steyn – accused of defaming climate change theorist Michael Mann – reflects an increasingly dangerous tendency among our intellectual classes to embrace homogeneity of viewpoint. Steyn, whose column has appeared for years on these pages, may be alternatingly entertaining or over-the-top obnoxious, but the slander lawsuit against him marks a milestone in what has become a dangerously authoritarian worldview being adopted in academia, the media and large sections of the government bureaucracy.

These are the same people who historically have identified themselves with open-mindedness and the defense of free speech, while conservatives, with some justification, were associated more often with such traits as criminalizing unpopular views – as seen in the 1950s McCarthy era – and embracing canonical bans on all sorts of personal behavior, a tendency still more evident than necessary among some socially minded conservatives.

But when it comes to authoritarian expression of “true” beliefs, it’s the progressive Left that increasingly seeks to impose orthodoxy. In this rising intellectual order, those who dissent on everything from climate change, the causes of poverty and the definition of marriage, to opposition to abortion are increasingly marginalized and, in some cases, as in the Steyn trial, legally attacked.

One Response to “The Spread of ‘Debate is Over’ Syndrome”

  1. ErisGuy Says:

    Bunkum. These are the same people, their descendants and epigone, who were the target of McCarthyism: Leninist, Maoists, Stalinists, Marxists, et. al. and they have never been in favor of free speech, not within the party (where followers must toe the party line) and not for others.